Hallo and welcome lubod: you write, Firefox is an awful pig with number 1, even with no/few plugins! The following NEW packages will be installed:įalkon libaribb24-0 libbasicusageenvironment1 libdbusmenu-qt5-2 libdca0 libdvbpsi10 libebml4v5 libfam0 libgroupsock8 libixml10 libkate1 libkf5archive5 libkf5auth-dataĠ upgraded, 75 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.Īfter this operation, 203 MB of additional disk space will be used. Libkf5config-bin libkf5dbusaddons-bin libkf5iconthemes-bin kwayland-integration qtwayland5 libvlc-bin libproxy-tools Libvlccore9 libwebpdemux2 libxcb-xv0 phonon4qt5 phonon4qt5-backend-vlc vlc-data vlc-plugin-base vlc-plugin-video-outputįam lirc phonon4qt5-backend-gstreamer libdvdcss2 Libqt5webengine-data libqt5webenginecore5 libqt5webenginewidgets5 libre2-5 libsdl-image1.2 libspatialaudio0 libspeexdsp1 libupnp13 libusageenvironment3 libvlc5 Liblivemedia64 libmatroska6v5 libmicrodns0 libnfs12 libopenmpt-modplug1 libphonon4qt5-4 libplacebo7 libpolkit-qt5-1-1 libprotobuf-lite17 libqt5texttospeech5 Libkf5wallet-data libkf5wallet5 libkf5widgetsaddons-data libkf5widgetsaddons5 libkf5windowsystem-data libkf5windowsystem5 libkwalletbackend5-5 liblirc-client0 Libkf5itemviews-data libkf5itemviews5 libkf5notifications-data libkf5notifications5 libkf5service-bin libkf5service-data libkf5service5 libkf5wallet-bin Libkf5coreaddons5 libkf5crash5 libkf5dbusaddons-data libkf5dbusaddons5 libkf5guiaddons5 libkf5i18n-data libkf5i18n5 libkf5iconthemes-data libkf5iconthemes5 Libkf5auth5 libkf5codecs-data libkf5codecs5 libkf5config-data libkf5configcore5 libkf5configgui5 libkf5configwidgets-data libkf5configwidgets5 libkf5coreaddons-data Libaribb24-0 libbasicusageenvironment1 libdbusmenu-qt5-2 libdca0 libdvbpsi10 libebml4v5 libfam0 libgroupsock8 libixml10 libkate1 libkf5archive5 libkf5auth-data The following additional packages will be installed: Hopefully that is true of CPU load as well.īTW This is what happens if you try to install falkon on antiX-19. I noticed as your announcements warn, RAM usage is up a bit, but still usable. I see 17.x is supported until 2022, but unless something absolutely can’t run in 19.1, why wait? □ If speed/RAM usage is not much worse. On another note, I’ll be moving even the odd 32 bit system to antix 19.1 when I can, just to stay more current. Qupzilla 1.8.9 from the repos OTOH works nicely on antix 17 32 bit! Even trying to find the last Qupzilla before it became Falkon, is an exercise in frustration! I came upon the source for Qupzilla 2.2.6, and it requires QT 5.8 (Stretch/antix 17 have 5.7.1)! I don’t give up easy, I’m looking at Qupzilla 2.1.2 source, which only requires QT 5.7 and is two years newer than version 1.8.9 from repos! Shame that it is now anything BUT lean and mean! Besides what you mention, the lack of a new enough QT5 on antix 17, and the new, much longer list of dependencies, there is one more deal breaker, at least for old hardware: Only 64 bit QT5 (>5.9.0) is provided at the qt site, and compiling yourself reportedly takes hours, and fails anyway! And that is the minimum QT5 required for Falkon since version 3.0 in 2017! Update: K-Meleon started development again.0 you for the additional info on Falkon. Get K-Meleon from here (Last update was almost 30 months back - Just for your information) K-Meleon is using the Gecko engine which is used by the Firefox also. The memory footprint of K-Meleon is very light compared to other browsers including Opera, Firefox or Chrome.Īre you looking for a browser which is light on memory foot print ? you can try K-Meleon. I would like to test some other browsers like K-Meleon and Qupzilla, here am just sharing a 4 tabbed memory usage only The memory usage of Operas previous version, opera 12 is better than the Opera 15 it seems. So still the Firefox seems to be good, for me on the memory usage. No add-on or extensions are used, opera have the speed dials set. Opera is the latest version 15 which is based on the chromium. Unlike Firefox the opera and Chrome creates separate tasks for each tab. Just tested the memory usage of three browsers Opera, Chrome and Firefox. You can check 3 Alternate Browsers - Lightweight browsers to check 3 other alternative browsers and their memory footprint. I was an Opera fan, before when it was using its own engine, now opera is just another chrome, now using Firefox as my default browser.Memory usage of the Firefox seemed very high, so I just thought of testing Opera and Chrome in comparison with it. Here we will have a look on the memory usage of the 5 browsers to find out which is the best light weight browser. It should have all the features and also it must be light on memory usage. Every user wants the best light weight browser for them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |